Dear Clients and Partners,
For years, minority shareholder protection in Vietnam was often treated as a "check-the-box" exercise: a set of standard clauses tucked away in a corporate charter that few expected to actually use. However, as we navigate through 2026, the legal landscape has shifted dramatically. With the full implementation of the 2026 Corporate Governance Code and the recent amendments to the Securities Law, the "old way" of protecting minority interests is no longer just ineffective; it is a liability.
At BLaw Vietnam, we have observed that many businesses: especially those with foreign direct investment (FDI): are still operating under outdated protection frameworks. These strategies fail to account for the new "Comply or Explain" regime and the rigorous transparency mandates now enforced by the State Securities Commission (SSC) and the Ministry of Planning and Investment.
If your current governance structure feels like it’s struggling to keep pace, here are 10 reasons why your minority shareholder protection strategy isn't working: and how the 2026 reforms are designed to fix them.
1. You Are Still Clinging to the "10% Threshold"
Under the previous Law on Enterprises 2014, many protections were only triggered when a shareholder held at least 10% of ordinary shares. Many current charters still reflect this old standard.
- The 2026 Reality: The Law on Enterprises 2020 and subsequent 2026 guidelines have permanently lowered the threshold for key oversight rights (such as calling a General Meeting or requesting an audit) to just 5%.
- The Fix: The new code mandates that companies recognize these rights immediately, regardless of what your "Legacy Charter" says.
2. The "Six-Month Seasoning" Trap
In the past, shareholders had to hold their stake for at least six consecutive months before they could exercise basic rights. This allowed majority owners to "freeze out" new activist investors.
- The 2026 Reality: This requirement has been abolished. A shareholder who buys in today has the same oversight rights tomorrow.
- The Fix: The 2026 framework ensures that protection is tied to ownership, not tenure, preventing majority blocks from making major changes during an investor's "waiting period."
3. Ignoring the "Comply or Explain" Principle
Many firms believe that if they aren't listed, governance codes are merely "suggestions."
- The 2026 Reality: Vietnam has adopted the "Comply or Explain" rule. While primarily for public companies, it is becoming the gold standard for all high-value enterprises. If you don't follow best practices for minority protection, you must provide a transparent, expert-backed explanation in your annual filings.
- The Fix: This rule forces a higher level of Corporate Governance by making silence or non-compliance a matter of public (and regulatory) record.
4. Beneficial Ownership is a "Black Box"
Your strategy fails if you don't know who the majority owner actually is. Using holding companies or "nominee" arrangements to hide control is no longer viable.
- The 2026 Reality: The Beneficial Ownership Transparency Mandate (effective July 2025/2026) requires every enterprise to trace ownership back to a natural person.
- The Fix: By unmasking the ultimate individuals in control, minority shareholders can better identify potential conflicts of interest and "related party" transactions that might disadvantage them.
5. Weak Audit Committees and Lacking Independence
If your "Supervisory Board" is composed of the Chairman’s cousins, your minority protection is a facade.
- The 2026 Reality: The updated code emphasizes the role of Independent Directors. For many entities, at least one-third of the board must now be independent.
- The Fix: Independent audit committees act as a shield for minority investors, ensuring that financial reporting: including Tax Settlements: is accurate and not manipulated to suppress dividends.
6. "Boilerplate" Reporting is Flagged by Regulators
Providing generic, copy-pasted governance reports in your annual disclosure used to be common practice.
- The 2026 Reality: Regulators are now using AI-driven tools to flag "boilerplate" explanations. Static text that hasn't changed in three years will trigger a Post-Licensing Audit.
- The Fix: The 2026 Code requires substantive, case-specific reporting, giving minority shareholders a clear window into how the company is actually being managed.
7. Failure to Use the National Digital Portal
Are your board resolutions still "signed and filed" in a physical cabinet?
- The 2026 Reality: The 2026 Investment Law mandates that significant board resolutions and governance reports be logged through a centralized national digital portal.
- The Fix: This prevents the "backdating" of resolutions by majority shareholders: a common tactic used to dilute minority stakes or approve disadvantageous contracts retroactively.
8. Preference Shares Without "Veto" Rights
Many investors use dividend preference shares but forget that these shares often lose their voting rights in a standard charter.
- The 2026 Reality: The Law on Enterprises 2020/2026 grants preference shareholders the right to vote on any resolution that adversely affects their rights. Such resolutions now require approval by 75% of those specific shareholders.
- The Fix: This prevents "Ordinary" majority holders from voting away the benefits of "Preference" minority holders without their explicit consent.
9. Vulnerability to Dilution via Private Issuance
A common way to "squeeze out" a minority holder is to issue new shares at a low price to a "friendly" third party.
- The 2026 Reality: The Amended Securities Law (2025/2026) imposes much stricter conditions on private issuances. Companies must now clearly state the offering price or the principles for determining that price, rather than leaving it to board discretion.
- The Fix: This transparency makes it significantly harder for a board to push through dilutive deals that lack commercial justification.
10. Lack of Bilingual Disclosure
In a globalized market, if you only provide information in Vietnamese, your foreign minority investors are effectively blind.
- The 2026 Reality: Simultaneous bilingual disclosure (Vietnamese and English) is now mandatory for large organizations and highly recommended for any FDI enterprise.
- The Fix: Ensuring that all shareholders receive the same information at the same time is the cornerstone of Intellectual Property and corporate trust.
How BLaw Vietnam Can Help
Navigating the complexities of the 2026 Corporate Governance Code requires more than just legal knowledge; it requires a strategic understanding of how the Vietnamese authorities are enforcing these new rules. At BLaw Vietnam, we specialize in:
- Charter Audits: We review your existing corporate charter to ensure it aligns with the 5% threshold and the removal of the 6-month rule.
- Beneficial Owner Disclosures: We help you map your corporate structure to the "Natural Person" level to ensure full compliance with the Ministry of Planning and Investment.
- Comply or Explain Strategy: Our team drafts substantive, expert-backed explanations for any governance departures, protecting your reputation and your M&A valuation.
- Independent Director Training: We provide counsel to board members on their fiduciary duties toward minority shareholders.
The shift toward transparency in 2026 is an opportunity for businesses to attract higher-quality investment and build long-term market resilience. By optimizing your minority protection strategy today, you are not just complying with the law: you are future-proofing your business.
Ready to modernize your corporate governance?
Contact the experts at BLaw Vietnam today for a comprehensive consultation. Our knowledgeable attorneys are here to ensure your business stays ahead of the curve.
